If you are a South African taxpayer with offshore interests, the landscape in which you operate is undergoing a fundamental shift. Increased international cooperation and enhanced domestic oversight means that the days of "offshore privacy" are largely behind us, as the South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) has strengthened its ability to detect undeclared foreign bank accounts, investments (including digital assets like cryptocurrency), and offshore asset-holding structures like companies and trusts. If you need to regularise your affairs, we propose that you consider SARS’ Voluntary Disclosure Program (“VDP”).
The Supreme Court of Appeal (“SCA”) delivered a unanimous judgment in Baseline Civil Contractors (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service on 24 February 2026, providing definitive guidance on the limits of a taxpayer’s ability to amend their case during an appeal. The ruling clarifies the scope of Rule 32(3) of the Tax Court Rules, confirming that while taxpayers have some flexibility, they cannot use an appeal to introduce fundamentally new cases that target parts of an assessment never previously challenged.
The recent media ping-pong between Tshepo Lucky Montana (“Montana”) and the South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) has brought the country’s attention towards SARS’ obligation to protect taxpayer confidentiality and the very limited circumstances where SARS may disclose any information regarding taxpayers.
The postponement of the budget speech which was set to take place on Wednesday, 19 February 2025 has left the country questioning exactly what could have been in the budget that was so controversial that the speech could not go ahead but had to be postponed until 12 March 2025.
It is important for South Africa, on a global stage, to be able to illustrate our commitment to reducing and combating the impact of climate change. However, the real commitment is firstly to the people of South Africa who are most vulnerable and must have their social, economic and environmental rights protected.
In the current climate with taxpayers having to juggle, amongst other things, the devastating effects of Covid, with the unforeseen losses of the civil unrest, it may be that some could find themselves in a difficult position to deal with expected and unexpected tax liabilities.
It is well known that litigation in any court can be a protracted battle. It is a journey that litigants have to be prepared for, both mentally and financially. In the midst of it all, one should weigh up the principles (the subject matter) of the dispute and the commercial advantages of finding a resolution to the matter.
BEWARE OF CYBERCRIME.WE ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE IF YOU PAY INTO THE WRONG ACCOUNT
Shepstone & Wylie (S&W) will not change its banking details.
Any communication you receive stating we have done so will be false - please contact us immediately.
If you bank with Standard Bank, Nedbank, Investec, FNB or Absa Bank you are encouraged to pay us using the bank approved beneficiary: Shepstone and Wylie Attorneys.
If you don’t use the bank approved beneficiary option, you must always call us to verify our banking details before making any payment.
We use cookies to make your experience with us better. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more see our privacy policy.
